Monday, November 30, 2015

3rd paper rough draft


 

           

            We live in a high-tech world. People today use technology for almost everything. Your alarm clock wakes you up; you start a pot of Keurig coffee and turn on the T.V.  Those are just 3 easy everyday tasks someone may normally do that currently, we more than not rely on technology for those simple life tasks. People also use technology to keep up with the news, to keep in communication with others, for educational purposes, to schedule their day accordingly, and the list just keeps on going. There is a problem though- we use mass amounts of technology in our everyday lives, which we are now starting to become too dependent on technology to live and manage our everyday lives it is starting to affect our overall health. According to Nielsen’s Total Audience Report, “Americans aged 18 and older spend more that 11 hours a day using electronic devices." Due to people relying too much on technology. There are both physical and mental health issues that cause a detriment to people. We’re starting to let technology run our lives.”

            People’s dependency of technology has numerous negative physical effects. With more use of technology, people are starting spend more time using electronic devices and technology than being active outside. This is causing an increase in obesity. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention states, “The percentage of children aged 6-11 years in the United States who were obese increased from 7% in 1980 to nearly 18% in 2012. Similarly, the percentage of adolescents aged 12-19 years who were obese increased from 5% to nearly 21% over the same period.” As technology continues to advance, so with the population of obese people. In this article Obesity Rates & Trends Overview by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, they indicate that obesity rates have more than doubles in the last 35 years and that the average American is more than 24 pounds heavier today than in 1960. (Paraphrase from an online magazine with no page number.)

 

            As society starts to become more and more dependent on technology, this generation of adolescents have grown up with always having technology around us to be dependent on. This causes this generation of kids to become addicted to technology and start to use it excessively. The excessive use of technology causes many negative mental conditions. Overuse of technology can change a child’s brain. An article in Psychology Today states that the use of technology can alter the wiring of the brain. However, people may argue that adults today do not have any harsh long-term effects from becoming dependent on technology, this current generation of children and teenagers are the first generation of a community that has been born and raised by technology. A summary of an article in Psychology Today, they stated that more than a third of children under the age of two use some form of mobile media. According to a report from Common Sense Media released a specific study that found 38% of kids under the age of two have used tablets or smart phones. The usage of mobile media only grows with the child’s age, with 97% of teens 12-17 spend time online. Technology does not give people new ideas on things, but technology trains the brain to pay attention to multiple stimuli, which leads to distraction or decreased memory. Technology also can affect a child’s brain by affecting his ability to empathize, which can also affect the general public. A study was conducted and later published in the journal Computers in Human Behavior. They took two groups of 6th graders, one was sent to Pali Institute- an outdoor education camp with no electronic devices. For the second group, their life was normal-controlled. Researchers found that went to camp without any electronics scored significantly higher to reading facial emotions or non-verbal clues.

            People can argue that technology has made the economy better and safer. Small businesses can now used advanced internet marketing tools for a small budget in order to compete with big companies. However, Technology has put our privacy and safety at risk. Today, children who are using technology are way younger than they have been before and therefore they typically do not know what information is safe to share online and what is not. According to Enough-Is-Enough, 82% of online sex crimes against children, the sex offenders have used technology and social media to get information about their victim. The overdependence of technology has lead to an increase in online bullying. This is because technology is often not face-to-face; it is easier for the bully to attack someone online than in person. Statistics from NVEEE (National Voice for Equality Education and Enlightenment) explains that “One million children were harassed, threatened, or subjected to other forms of cyber bullying on Facebook in 2011.”

            People have pointed out that we use technology for communication. I agree that technology has its positive affects, such as being able to communicate with family or friends or to stay updated with current events. But us as people need to understand when it’s going too far. When we start becoming too dependant on technology, people become isolated. It is easy to become tempted and to isolate yourself from others, especially when technology is causing an illusion that you are communicating with people on sites like Facebook, Twitter and Instagram, when you’re really not. In an article by Sheri Hosale in RooGirl Magazine website, Sheri Hosale states, “Technology creates the perfect recipe for depression with lack of human contact, overeating and lack of exercise. There is a reason the use of antidepressants are on the rise and the blame can’t be completely dumped on the pharmaceutical companies.” (Quotations from an online magazine with no page numbers.)

            Technology has advanced us as a race and will continue to do so. However, it is our responsibility to not abuse technology to the point where we are unable to function without it.  According to Bruce D. Perry, MD, PhD, senior fellow of CMTAS Initiative, “Modern technologies are very powerful because they rely on one of the most powerful genetic biases [us] have- the preference for visual presented information.” In his book, How Nurture Becomes Nature: The Influence of Social Structures on the Development of the Brain and Maltreated Children, Perry tells us, “Children need real-life experiences with real people to truly benefit from available technologies. Technologies should be used to enhance curriculum and experiences.” We need to learn and actively participate in social functions and outdoor physical activity. This would not only start to diminish our obesity rate, children would not be on any devices as much which will improve their mental health.  Lastly, we need to properly educate everyone on the proper and safe way to use technology.

Thursday, November 19, 2015

Analysis of our articles and Spriggs essay



1.      The Sprigg’s essay is Sprigg’s forming and sharing her opinion on local grown organic produce. Her opinion was expressed that the advantages of locally owned farms outweigh the disadvantages. She then presented very picky counterarguments that counter argued her point so her position looked stronger.

2.      The second article we analyzed was about the legalization of marijuana in Colorado. The article was more pro legalization of marijuana because the data supports that highway fatalities have decreased since the legalization of marijuana. Some counterarguments that they made were that the anti-pot group, SAM pointed out that even before the first legal pot store opened in Washington State, the number of driver in that state testing positive for pot jumped by one-third.

3.      The last article we analyzed was the unrealistic nature of Photoshop and people to what we accept as “standard”. It was mainly against it due to the number of facts represented in the article. For example, from the 1990’s to now, due to photo shopping there has been an 119% increase in eating disorders for children 12 years and younger.

4.      The Sprigg’s essay and our analyzed articles differentiate due to lack of counterarguments in the positive and/or negative positions. The articles are more statistical-based, rather than the Sprigg’s essay which is more observational. However, the Sprigg’s essay and the analyzed articles are all similar in the way that they all have a very strong stance and position on their topic.   

Paper #3 position paper- topic and arguments

Position paper topic: Are people becoming too dependent on technology? 
My position: Yes, I believe people are becoming too dependent on technology. We rely on technology to keep us on time with our schedule, it helps us navigate places, it's helps us communicate, and it storages important information for us in a conscientious and orderly way. Most kids these days don't even know how to properly use a dictionary.
 Counter argument: technology has advanced us as a race and has brought us closer to people whom we were unable to contact before. It has made life easier for the economy, due to the stock market and cash registers that rely on technology to operate. 

Spriggs analysis questions

1. Yes, Katherine Spriggs has convinced me that the topic of growing and buying foods locally's advantaged out weight the disadvantages. She established her importance by relating her topic to world problems and how small things could impact the world globally in a very significant way. She also have many citations and references, which gave her a more powerful stance and showed that she worked and studied hard in this topic. 
2. Spriggs considers many counter arguments such as not having fruits during every season, she pointed out many global effects and how it will be bad for the nations economy. She responds by saying how we would cherish the fruits more when they are not available every season and that they will taste better growing in certain areas. Also, she argues that if the people of the United States would show their commitment on buying local, it could open up new conversations about environmentalism. Lastly, she argued that local farms hire local workers and brings profits to small rural communities. 
3. A selection of Spriggs essay that I found especially effective was the selection where she talk about global effects. I found this especially effective because she put it into a world perspective and thought very critically about what she said and I could tell she put a lot of thought into her thoughts and ideas she incorporated. 
4. Spriggs incorporated two photos that I thought were especially intruding. The photos of the small polyculture  farm and the other of the monoculture farm. I thought this was interesting because it put into perspective the difference between a small and big farm. 

Thursday, November 12, 2015

"Two Sisters Tragic" summary


From the video about the Two Sister Tragic, it had an emotional appeal because in the first line it established that the video was about grief. Secondly, they establish an emotional aspect to it they always have the parents “red-faced” with tears with the dog and with clips from their childhood. This video also had a logical appeal because the bottom line is that drunk driving kills and promotes driving lessons and they provide free transportation to insure safe driving throughout teenagers. This video showed ethos through the use of the video clips of their childhood to show that these people are just average and normal people, and that this can happen to anyone.

The Last Text Summary


This video was about three young teenagers who got into tragic accidents because they were texting and driving. The story was told by each of the sisters in a different way, but they all explained that they went to a party and got drunk and then decided to text and drive. The two daughters died, and only the friend survived. They then started an organization that gives free rides to people who are incapacitated and cannot drive on their own. This video was designed to pull on the audiences’ heart strings and emotions. This makes them feel obligated or more pressured into doing or being persuaded of not driving while drunk.

Tuesday, November 10, 2015

How Things Mean

Symbols of Patriotism:
USA: Suggests High patriotism, strength and power. Firstly, they use the symbol of America which is of the highest patriotism. Secondly, the eagle itself looks as though it’s extremely stern portraying a position of power. Thirdly, the American flag is on the eagle itself further giving a sense of patriotism.
Great Britain: Suggests that Britain is powerful and stands out from other nations whilst still being humble. Firstly, the dog looks off into the distance but also looks as though it’s not going to back down, giving a sense of power. Secondly, they use a light colored dog, which gives a sense of innocence while maintaining the ferocity that the dog is.
France: Suggest that France is more about the people and their ethical standards. Firstly, there’s not representation of their flag. However their slogan is carved in stone which suggests that it’s ever lasting compared to the dog and eagle because they have a limited amount of time. Secondly, the picture shows a camera which is used for surveillance and that means they’re focused on their people.
Watches:
Rolex: Suggests that you are in a position of wealth and power. Firstly, it does this through the use of the name, “Rolex” in general because it’s an expensive brand. It tells that the person is in a financially stable enough point in their lives to splurge money on luxury items that they don’t necessarily need.


Hello Kitty: Suggests that it’s for the youth and something to temporary satisfy a person. Firstly, it does this because of the low quality that the watch is. Also it is a lot smaller and compact possibly symbolizing a less financially stable position. There’s also a picture of the “Hello Kitty” cartoon on it which again suggests that it’s for children and those less financially stable and something temporary. 

Argument 1: Between all the symbols of patriotism they all differ in their own way but all present the same general ideas of representing what their country stands for.

Argument 2: Between the two watches, one can infer that Rolex is for those who are financially stable and for those who are successful. Compared to Hello Kitty which is something that’s just temporary